<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.codeplex.com/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>WCF vs Remoting</title><link>http://wcfvsremoting.codeplex.com/Project/ProjectRss.aspx</link><description>Project shows performance comparison between Windows Communication Foundation and .NET Remoting</description><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Add test of sending plain objects [DataContract]</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1583</link><description>It is something that should be done better with WCF than Remoting.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:21:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Add test of sending plain objects [DataContract] 20071012082103P</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/SourceControl/ListDownloadableCommits.aspx</link><description>Added comparison of sending plain object &amp;#40;single object returned from Operation&amp;#41;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:21:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in 20071012082102P</guid></item><item><title>UPDATED RELEASE: WCFvsRemoting-7847 - WCF speed-up (Sep 26, 2007)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=7341</link><description>Here you can find details of what was changed in the release:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[url:http://geekswithblogs.net/marcel/archive/2007/09/26/115651.aspx]</description><author></author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:08:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">UPDATED RELEASE: WCFvsRemoting-7847 - WCF speed-up (Sep 26, 2007) 20070926090831P</guid></item><item><title>UPDATED RELEASE: WCFvsRemoting-7847 - WCF speed-up (Sep 26, 2007)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=7341</link><description>Here you can find details of what was changed in the release:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[url:http://geekswithblogs.net/marcel/archive/2007/09/26/115651.aspx]</description><author></author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:07:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">UPDATED RELEASE: WCFvsRemoting-7847 - WCF speed-up (Sep 26, 2007) 20070926090732P</guid></item><item><title>UPDATED RELEASE: WCFvsRemoting-7847 - WCF speed-up (Sep 26, 2007)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=7341</link><description>Here you can find details of what was changed in the release:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[url:http://geekswithblogs.net/marcel/archive/2007/09/26/115651.aspx]</description><author></author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:06:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">UPDATED RELEASE: WCFvsRemoting-7847 - WCF speed-up (Sep 26, 2007) 20070926090607P</guid></item><item><title>UPDATED WIKI: Home</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/Wiki/View.aspx?title=Home&amp;version=8</link><description>&lt;div class="wikidoc"&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Project Description&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Project shows performance comparison between Windows Communication Foundation and .NET Remoting
&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Project Details&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The project shows performance comparison between WCF and .NET Remoting. It was originally just a check whether to migrate to WCF from the .NET Remoting or not. Performance results was originally published on Marcin Celej's blog and can be found here: &lt;a href="http://geekswithblogs.net/marcel/archive/2007/04/12/111542.aspx" class="externalLink"&gt;WCF vs. Remoting (with DataSet)- performance comparison&lt;span class="externalLinkIcon"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Adjustments made to improve WCF performance are explained here: &lt;a href="http://geekswithblogs.net/marcel/archive/2007/09/26/115651.aspx" class="externalLink"&gt;WCF vs Remoting - adjustments to my results&lt;span class="externalLinkIcon"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;If there will be any need to extend the project it will be developed further. Let me know if you need something in this area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:04:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">UPDATED WIKI: Home 20070926090449P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED RELEASE: WCFvsRemoting-7847 - WCF speed-up (Sep 26, 2007)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=7341</link><description>Here you can find details of what was changed in the release:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[url:http://geekswithblogs.net/marcel/archive/2007/09/26/115651.aspx]</description><author></author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:02:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED RELEASE: WCFvsRemoting-7847 - WCF speed-up (Sep 26, 2007) 20070926090238P</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/SourceControl/ListDownloadableCommits.aspx</link><description>Added Excel file with comparison results</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:52:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in 20070926085232P</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Cache ChannelFactory and create it only once</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1582</link><description>According to comments on http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;geekswithblogs.net&amp;#47;marcel&amp;#47;archive&amp;#47;2007&amp;#47;04&amp;#47;12&amp;#47;111542.aspx&amp;#160;it should speed up performance.&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:01:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Cache ChannelFactory and create it only once 20070926080130P</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/SourceControl/ListDownloadableCommits.aspx</link><description>Added caching of ChannelFactory</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:01:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in 20070926080129P</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Switch the SecurityMode on netTcpBinding to None</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1581</link><description>According to comments on http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;geekswithblogs.net&amp;#47;marcel&amp;#47;archive&amp;#47;2007&amp;#47;04&amp;#47;12&amp;#47;111542.aspx&amp;#160;it should improve performance.&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:56:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Switch the SecurityMode on netTcpBinding to None 20070926075643P</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/SourceControl/ListDownloadableCommits.aspx</link><description>Security switched off for NetTcpBinding</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:56:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in 20070926075642P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: Add test of sending plain objects [DataContract]</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1583</link><description>It is something that should be done better with WCF than Remoting.&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:28:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: Add test of sending plain objects [DataContract] 20070926072856P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: Cache ChannelFactory and create it only once</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1582</link><description>According to comments on http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;geekswithblogs.net&amp;#47;marcel&amp;#47;archive&amp;#47;2007&amp;#47;04&amp;#47;12&amp;#47;111542.aspx&amp;#160;it should speed up performance.&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:27:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: Cache ChannelFactory and create it only once 20070926072723P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: Switch the SecurityMode on netTcpBinding to None</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1581</link><description>According to comments on http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;geekswithblogs.net&amp;#47;marcel&amp;#47;archive&amp;#47;2007&amp;#47;04&amp;#47;12&amp;#47;111542.aspx&amp;#160;it should improve performance.&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:24:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: Switch the SecurityMode on netTcpBinding to None 20070926072446P</guid></item><item><title>UPDATED RELEASE: Sources (sie 29, 2007)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=6774</link><description>Here are available sources of the performance comparison</description><author></author><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:51:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">UPDATED RELEASE: Sources (sie 29, 2007) 20070829085110P</guid></item><item><title>UPDATED RELEASE: Sources</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=6774</link><description>Here are available sources of the performance comparison</description><author></author><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:47:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">UPDATED RELEASE: Sources 20070829084738P</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Wrong AssemblyInfo content in Client and Server assemblies</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=985</link><description>&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:00:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Wrong AssemblyInfo content in Client and Server assemblies 20070824070007A</guid></item><item><title>REOPENED ISSUE: Wrong AssemblyInfo content in Client and Server assemblies</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=985</link><description>&lt;br/&gt;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:57:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">REOPENED ISSUE: Wrong AssemblyInfo content in Client and Server assemblies 20070824065756A</guid></item><item><title>UPDATED WIKI: Home</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/WCFvsRemoting/Wiki/View.aspx?title=Home&amp;version=7</link><description>&lt;div class="wikidoc"&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Project Description&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Project shows performance comparison between Windows Communication Foundation and .NET Remoting
&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Project Details&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The project shows performance comparison between WCF and .NET Remoting. It was originally just a check whether to migrate to WCF from the .NET Remoting or not. Performance results was originally published on Marcin Celej's blog and can be found here: &lt;a href="http://geekswithblogs.net/marcel/archive/2007/04/12/111542.aspx" class="externalLink"&gt;WCF vs. Remoting (with DataSet)- performance comparison&lt;span class="externalLinkIcon"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;If there will be any need to extend the project it will be developed further. Let me know if you need something in this area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>MarcinCelej</author><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:40:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">UPDATED WIKI: Home 20070823074039P</guid></item></channel></rss>